NVIDIA (NVDA) price forecast
NVIDIA is trading at 197.53. Over the next 4 hours our simulation puts it between 193.23 and 202.21— that's the 10th-to-90th percentile of 20,000 modelled outcomes, so roughly four times in five it should land inside that band. The odds of finishing higher are near a coin toss, so the model claims no directional signal here — the range is the whole forecast. These are probabilities, not predictions of certainty, and the backtest below shows exactly how often the model has been right.
Price history & forecast cone — 10th–90th percentile of 20,000 simulated futures
NVIDIA forecast by timeframe
| Timeframe | Likely range | Midpoint | Odds higher |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Minutes | 196.83 – 198.18 | 197.50 | 48% |
| 15 Minutes | 196.29 – 198.62 | 197.45 | 47% |
| 1 Hour | 195.33 – 199.82 | 197.56 | 51% |
| 4 Hours | 193.23 – 202.21 | 197.67 | 52% |
| 30 Minutes | Available on Pro → | ||
| 1 Day | Available on Pro → | ||
| 1 Week | Available on Pro → | ||
| 1 Month | Available on Pro → | ||
| 6 Months | Available on Pro → | ||
| 1 Year | Available on Pro → | ||
| 5 Years | Available on Pro → | ||
Intraday horizons are free. Longer horizons — 1 day through 5 years — are part of Pro.
How accurate has this model been on NVIDIA?
Every forecast site claims accuracy. Here is ours, measured by walk-forward backtest on data the model never saw during training. Where it has no edge over a naive baseline, we say so.
| Horizon | Directional accuracy | Baseline | Edge | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-day | 53.5% | 54.2% | -0.7% | no edge |
| 7-day | 58.0% | 58.3% | -0.3% | no edge |
| 30-day | 58.6% | 64.7% | -6.1% | no edge |
Backtested on 1925unseen samples. "No edge" means the model was no better than assuming the recent trend continues — an honest result, and a common one.
What the model is saying about NVIDIA
The model expects modest gains for NVDA from its current 206.84. Over one week it projects about 208 (+0.56%), with a 10th-to-90th-percentile range of roughly 191 to 227 and a 59.8% chance of finishing higher. The one-month view centers near 211 (+2.07%, 63.7% up, range 178 to 252), and the one-year view near 270 (+30.4%, 71.1% up, range 146 to 498). Note reliability is flagged moderate, low, and very low as the horizon lengthens. The wide ranges reflect high annualised volatility of 47.4%, and recent momentum is mildly positive with a trailing-month change of +4.36%. Bluntly, the ML model shows no measurable edge: at every horizon it fails to beat the naive baseline — 53.5% vs 54.2% at one day, 58.0% vs 58.3% at one week, and 58.6% vs 64.7% at one month. This outlook could break down given the sizable volatility, which makes the outer ranges plausible, and the low-to-very-low reliability ratings, particularly for the longer horizons where the wide bands undercut confidence.
How to read this forecast
We don't publish a single price target, because nobody can know one. Instead the engine runs 20,000 simulated futures for NVIDIA and reports the band containing the middle 80% of them — the 10th to 90th percentile. A wide band means genuine uncertainty; a narrow one means the recent range has been calm. The odds higher figure is a calibrated probability: when we say 60%, outcomes of that kind should finish higher about 60 times in 100. Near 50% there is no directional signal at all, and the range itself is the entire forecast.
More depth: what a forecast cone is, how to read a P10–P90 range, and what makes a probability trustworthy. Our public accuracy scorecard shows where the model has an edge — and where it has none.
See the live NVIDIA forecast
Streaming prices, an interactive cone across every timeframe, and the full honesty scorecard.
Open NVIDIA in Coneview →Other stock forecasts
Forecasts are probabilistic estimates from historical price data, not financial advice. Short-horizon direction has only a small measurable edge; long-horizon numbers reflect drift plus widening uncertainty and should be read as ranges, not targets. Figures update hourly. Coneview provides statistical market information, not financial advice.