Coneview

How accurate is Coneview?

Every forecasting service claims accuracy. Almost none publishes the times it was wrong. This page does, and it updates automatically — we cannot quietly drop a bad result.

Across the 6 instruments and 18 horizons below, the model beats a naive baseline on 2 of 18. On the rest it has no edge — and we show those rows rather than hiding them. That is the honest state of short-horizon market forecasting, ours included.

What we're measuring

Live results

InstrumentHorizonAccuracyBaselineEdgeVerdict
Bitcoin1-day49.8%50.7%-0.9%no edge
7-day51.1%52.4%-1.3%no edge
30-day53.4%53.8%-0.4%no edge
Gold Spot1-day52.7%53.8%-1.1%no edge
7-day57.9%57.9%+0.0%no edge
30-day54.4%64.5%-10.1%no edge
Apple1-day52.7%53.7%-1.0%no edge
7-day57.7%58.0%-0.3%no edge
30-day60.8%63.5%-2.7%no edge
S&P 5001-day53.8%54.8%-0.9%no edge
7-day61.1%60.6%+0.5%has edge
30-day67.1%67.3%-0.2%no edge
EUR/USD1-day48.7%51.2%-2.5%no edge
7-day50.0%50.7%-0.7%no edge
30-day51.5%52.1%-0.6%no edge
Crude Oil Futures1-day52.6%52.8%-0.2%no edge
7-day51.7%53.4%-1.6%no edge
30-day52.8%51.5%+1.3%has edge

Refreshed automatically. Each instrument's full scorecard, including probability calibration, lives on its own forecast page.

Why so many rows say "no edge"

Because markets are close to efficient, and short-horizon direction is mostly noise. A model that claimed an edge everywhere would be overfitting its own history and lying to you about it. When the direction is a coin toss, Coneview says so — and the range becomes the entire forecast, which is still genuinely useful information about how much room the market plausibly has.

This is the whole premise of the product. We would rather tell you we don't know than sell you a confident number we invented. Read more on what makes a probability trustworthy.

Past performance does not guarantee future results. Backtested figures are out-of-sample but remain historical. Coneview provides statistical market information, not financial advice.