Corn Futures (ZC=F) price forecast
Corn Futures is trading at 481.25. Over the next 4 hours our simulation puts it between 477.32 and 486.21— that's the 10th-to-90th percentile of 20,000 modelled outcomes, so roughly four times in five it should land inside that band. The model puts the odds of finishing higher at 56%. These are probabilities, not predictions of certainty, and the backtest below shows exactly how often the model has been right.
Price history & forecast cone — 10th–90th percentile of 20,000 simulated futures
Corn Futures forecast by timeframe
| Timeframe | Likely range | Midpoint | Odds higher |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Minutes | 480.52 – 481.96 | 481.24 | 49% |
| 15 Minutes | 479.97 – 482.46 | 481.22 | 49% |
| 1 Hour | 479.16 – 483.60 | 481.37 | 53% |
| 4 Hours | 477.32 – 486.21 | 481.74 | 56% |
| 30 Minutes | Available on Pro → | ||
| 1 Day | Available on Pro → | ||
| 1 Week | Available on Pro → | ||
| 1 Month | Available on Pro → | ||
| 6 Months | Available on Pro → | ||
| 1 Year | Available on Pro → | ||
| 5 Years | Available on Pro → | ||
Intraday horizons are free. Longer horizons — 1 day through 5 years — are part of Pro.
How accurate has this model been on Corn Futures?
Every forecast site claims accuracy. Here is ours, measured by walk-forward backtest on data the model never saw during training. Where it has no edge over a naive baseline, we say so.
| Horizon | Directional accuracy | Baseline | Edge | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-day | 48.3% | 50.2% | -2.0% | no edge |
| 7-day | 50.2% | 52.5% | -2.2% | no edge |
| 30-day | 49.3% | 53.7% | -4.4% | no edge |
Backtested on 1790unseen samples. "No edge" means the model was no better than assuming the recent trend continues — an honest result, and a common one.
What the model is saying about Corn Futures
From a starting point of 481.25, the model sees only modest drift higher. Over one week it expects about 482.06 (+0.17%), over one month 484.08 (+0.59%), and over one year 520.66 (+8.19%). Confidence is limited: the probability of an upward move is 53.9% at one week, 52.2% at one month, and 65.2% at one year, with reliability rated moderate, low, and very low respectively. Ranges widen sharply with time — the one-year 10th-to-90th percentile band spans roughly 401 to 677. The context is a 20.31% annualised volatility and a strong trailing-month gain of 14.35%, which helps explain the wide forecast cones. Bluntly, the ML model shows no measurable edge: at 1, 7, and 30 days its accuracy (48.3%, 50.2%, 49.3%) trails the naive baseline (50.2%, 52.5%, 53.7%) every time. Elevated volatility, the very low longer-horizon reliability, and the model's failure to beat a coin-flip baseline all argue for treating these numbers cautiously; a shift in that volatility or momentum backdrop would undermine the outlook.
How to read this forecast
We don't publish a single price target, because nobody can know one. Instead the engine runs 20,000 simulated futures for Corn Futures and reports the band containing the middle 80% of them — the 10th to 90th percentile. A wide band means genuine uncertainty; a narrow one means the recent range has been calm. The odds higher figure is a calibrated probability: when we say 60%, outcomes of that kind should finish higher about 60 times in 100. Near 50% there is no directional signal at all, and the range itself is the entire forecast.
More depth: what a forecast cone is, how to read a P10–P90 range, and what makes a probability trustworthy. Our public accuracy scorecard shows where the model has an edge — and where it has none.
See the live Corn Futures forecast
Streaming prices, an interactive cone across every timeframe, and the full honesty scorecard.
Open Corn Futures in Coneview →Other commodity forecasts
Forecasts are probabilistic estimates from historical price data, not financial advice. Short-horizon direction has only a small measurable edge; long-horizon numbers reflect drift plus widening uncertainty and should be read as ranges, not targets. Figures update hourly. Coneview provides statistical market information, not financial advice.