Coneview

Cosmos (ATOM-USD) price forecast

Cosmos is trading at 1.27. Over the next 4 hours our simulation puts it between 1.25 and 1.28— that's the 10th-to-90th percentile of 20,000 modelled outcomes, so roughly four times in five it should land inside that band. The model puts the odds of finishing lower at 59%. These are probabilities, not predictions of certainty, and the backtest below shows exactly how often the model has been right.

Price history & forecast cone — 10th–90th percentile of 20,000 simulated futures

1.291.281.271.26NOW+4H · 9:22 AMP90 1.28 · 90th pctP10 1.25 · 10th pct

Cosmos forecast by timeframe

TimeframeLikely rangeMidpointOdds higher
5 Minutes1.271.271.2748%
15 Minutes1.271.281.2747%
1 Hour1.261.281.2745%
4 Hours1.251.281.2741%
30 MinutesAvailable on Pro →
1 DayAvailable on Pro →
1 WeekAvailable on Pro →
1 MonthAvailable on Pro →
6 MonthsAvailable on Pro →
1 YearAvailable on Pro →
5 YearsAvailable on Pro →

Intraday horizons are free. Longer horizons — 1 day through 5 years — are part of Pro.

How accurate has this model been on Cosmos?

Every forecast site claims accuracy. Here is ours, measured by walk-forward backtest on data the model never saw during training. Where it has no edge over a naive baseline, we say so.

HorizonDirectional accuracyBaselineEdgeVerdict
1-day49.8%51.3%-1.6%no edge
7-day51.2%54.9%-3.6%no edge
30-day46.3%60.0%-13.7%no edge

Backtested on 2080unseen samples. "No edge" means the model was no better than assuming the recent trend continues — an honest result, and a common one.

What the model is saying about Cosmos

From a current price of 1.27, the model leans mildly negative across all horizons. Over one week it expects 1.25 (-1.51%), with a P10–P90 band of 1.10 to 1.42 and a 55% chance of finishing higher. One month centres on 1.19 (-6.7%), roughly a coin-flip at 50% up. The one-year projection is 0.56 (-55.68%), with just a 13% probability of a gain and a wide 0.22–1.42 range. Reliability is tagged moderate, low, and very low respectively. The wide bands reflect annualised volatility of 71.67%, and the negative tilt echoes a trailing-month decline of 17.61%. Crucially, the ML model shows no measurable edge: at 1, 7, and 30 days it fails to beat the naive baseline (49.8% vs 51.3%, 51.2% vs 54.9%, and 46.3% vs 60.0%). Take the directional calls with skepticism. This outlook could be invalidated by shifts in realised volatility, a reversal of recent momentum, or the model's persistent underperformance versus baseline widening further.

How to read this forecast

We don't publish a single price target, because nobody can know one. Instead the engine runs 20,000 simulated futures for Cosmos and reports the band containing the middle 80% of them — the 10th to 90th percentile. A wide band means genuine uncertainty; a narrow one means the recent range has been calm. The odds higher figure is a calibrated probability: when we say 60%, outcomes of that kind should finish higher about 60 times in 100. Near 50% there is no directional signal at all, and the range itself is the entire forecast.

More depth: what a forecast cone is, how to read a P10–P90 range, and what makes a probability trustworthy. Our public accuracy scorecard shows where the model has an edge — and where it has none.

See the live Cosmos forecast

Streaming prices, an interactive cone across every timeframe, and the full honesty scorecard.

Open Cosmos in Coneview →

Other crypto forecasts

BitcoinEthereumSolanaXRPBNBCardanoDogecoinAvalancheChainlinkPolkadot

Forecasts are probabilistic estimates from historical price data, not financial advice. Short-horizon direction has only a small measurable edge; long-horizon numbers reflect drift plus widening uncertainty and should be read as ranges, not targets. Figures update hourly. Coneview provides statistical market information, not financial advice.